Privacy-preserving decision support

Turn ethical principles into practical guardrails.

Design, review and document defensible AI use in pharmacy education—while keeping human judgment, competence and accountability visible.

No data transmission. Assessments and saved work remain in this browser. Do not enter patient-identifiable or otherwise sensitive information.

0Saved assessments

12Preloaded scenarios

6PHARMA dimensions

0External data transfers

Learn by changing one variable

Use paired scenarios to see how context—not enthusiasm or anxiety—changes the guardrails.

Purpose and setting

Begin with the learning outcome—the role of AI follows from it.

Assessment title

Institution or college

Course, program or rotation

Faculty owner

Educational setting Choose the setting in which the proposed AI use occurs.

Stakes of the activity

Intended learning outcome Select the competencies learners are expected to develop or demonstrate.

What will the AI do? Select all proposed functions.

Brief educational purpose Describe the activity without names, patient details or sensitive information.

Most sensitive information involved

AI environment

Will the tool be required?

Is qualified human review mandatory before the output is used?

Must learners attempt or document their reasoning before using AI?

Must learners independently demonstrate the protected competence?

Are factual claims, calculations and references independently verified?

Is an oral defence or explanation required?

Is the permitted level of AI use explicitly stated?

Must learners disclose AI assistance?

Is an equivalent no-cost alternative available?

Supporting controls

Review date

Dynamic ethical review

PHARMA risk profile and guardrails

Scores guide comparison and discussion; they are not a validated risk instrument.

Policy Studio

Convert the decision into clear language

Generated locally from your answers. Edit before institutional use.

Faculty decision statement

Scenario library

Explore pharmacy-education differences

Load a scenario, change one factor and observe the live decision trace.

Local workspace

Saved profiles and outcomes

Stored only in this browser. Export a backup before moving devices or domains.

Compare

See what changes the decision

Compare any two preloaded or saved assessments side by side.

Scenario A

Scenario B

Transparent methodology

How the PHARMA Lens works

Every recommendation is deterministic, explainable and open to human review.

How the Guardrail Index is calculated

Each selected answer adds contextual risk or applies a documented safeguard to one or more PHARMA dimensions. The residual overall index uses the unrounded dimension values: 62% of the six-dimension mean plus 38% of the highest dimension, displayed to one decimal place. Critical incompatibilities determine the minimum decision category but do not inflate or freeze the numerical score.

Important limitation

The Guardrail Index is a structured decision-support indicator, not a psychometrically validated risk instrument. This application does not provide legal, regulatory, accreditation or institutional approval. Recommendations require review against applicable policies, professional standards, data-protection requirements and local regulations.

Methodology version: PHARMA Rules 1.1 · Application version: 1.1.0